Ordered that the order dated April 7, 2008, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The appellant contends that the Supreme Court erred in denying her motions, inter alia, to vacate a consent order and a judgment in the plaintiff's favor, on the ground that the attorney who previously represented her in this litigation was ineffective. However, "in the context of civil litigation, an attorney's errors or omissions are binding on the client and, absent extraordinary...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.