Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the jury should not have been allowed to hear statements made by police investigators during a videorecorded and audiorecorded interview of the defendant indicating that the investigators believed that the defendant was lying are unpreserved for appellate review, as no objection was made to the introduction of the tapes (see People v Keller,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.