The motion court providently exercised its discretion in ruling that the test boring project, its related documents, and the testimony of the NYCTA's project manager for the test boring project was relevant to this action arising from plaintiff's trip and fall on the metal cap and plywood sheet which covered the boring hole (see e.g. Daniels v City of New York,
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.