1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 61 A.D.3d
  5. 61 A.D.3d 672 (2009)
 

STRAUS v. AMBINDER

61 A.D.3d 672 (2009)

878 N.Y.S.2d 70

MARC STRAUS, Respondent, v. JEFFREY AMBINDER, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided April 7, 2009.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff met his burden of proving that the subpoenaed documents were protected by the attorney-client privilege (see CPLR 3101 [b]; 4503 [a]; Matter of Priest v Hennessy, 51 N.Y.2d 62, 69 [1980]). While a court is not bound by the conclusory characterizations of a client or his attorney, here, there was no reason to disregard the attorney's sworn statement regarding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases