ADDO v. MELNICK


61 A.D.3d 453 (2009)

877 N.Y.S.2d 261

JANET ADDO, Respondent, v. NEIL MELNICK, M.D., et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided April 9, 2009.


On reargument, the court denied defendants' motion because the alleged malpractice occurred in the Bronx. However, venue is based on the parties' residence (CPLR 503 [a]), not where the cause of action arose (Hitchoff v Air Brook Limousine, Inc., 26 A.D.3d 310 [2006]). The "residence" of a natural person is his or her abode, not office (see Friedman v Law, 60 A.D.2d 832 [1978]), and the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases