1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 61 A.D.3d
  5. 61 A.D.3d 404 (2009)
 

MATTER OF COFFINA v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL

61 A.D.3d 404 (2009)

877 N.Y.S.2d 249

In the Matter of EDWARD COFFINA, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL, Respondent, and CHAMPION PROPERTIES, LLC, Intervenor-Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided April 2, 2009.

Petitioner's argument that the parties intended the legal rent for the subject apartment to be the rent stated in the original lease, plus any statutory guideline increases, for the duration of the tenancy, is supported by the language in that lease (see e.g. Matter of Pastreich v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 50 A.D.3d 384 [2008]). The rent paid by petitioner in 2000 and 2001 was the legal regulated rent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases