The motion court appropriately exercised its discretion in consolidating this action with an action that was previously commenced by plaintiff Vanessa Walls pro se in Civil Court (see CPLR 602). The two cases present an identity of issues and common questions of law and fact, and defendants have failed to demonstrate that consolidation will prejudice a substantial right (Amcan Holdings, Inc. v Torys LLP,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
WALLS v. PRESTIGE MANAGEMENT, INC.
59 A.D.3d 311 (2009)
872 N.Y.S.2d 918
VANESSA R. WALLS et al., Respondents, v. PRESTIGE MANAGEMENT, INC., et al., Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 24, 2009.
Decided February 24, 2009.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.