1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.3d
  4. 12 N.Y.3d
  5. 12 N.Y.3d 51 (2009)
 

PEOPLE v. ROMEO

12 N.Y.3d 51 (2009)

___ N.E.2d ___

___ N.Y.S.2d ___

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. ANTHONY ROMEO, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Decided February 11, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead (Michael Blakey of counsel), for appellant.

Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand, Iason, Anello & Bohrer, P.C., New York City (Barry A. Bohrer and Kristy Watson Milkov of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: Judges GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and JONES.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Acting Chief Judge CIPARICK.

The question raised by this appeal is whether the People's lengthy postindictment delay occasioned by delaying their prosecution in favor of a Canadian prosecution violated defendant's constitutional right to a speedy trial. Applying the five-factor speedy trial analysis articulated in People v Taranovich (37 N.Y.2d 442

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases