1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 57 A.D.3d
  5. 57 A.D.3d 449 (2008)
 

IN MATTER OF BRODSKY v. NEW YORK CITY CAMPAIGN FINANCE BOARD

57 A.D.3d 449 (2008)

869 N.Y.S.2d 508

In the Matter of MERYL BRODSKY et al., Appellants, v. NEW YORK CITY CAMPAIGN FINANCE BOARD, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

December 30, 2008.

Respondent's penalty determination was not arbitrary, capricious or contrary to law. Based on the information before it, respondent acted reasonably in concluding that petitioners failed to meet their burden of establishing that the postelection payments to petitioner Feinsot represented routine and nominal expenses necessary for compliance with the postelection audit, and that the postelection payment to Staples for a 2005 holiday...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases