1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 57 A.D.3d
  5. 57 A.D.3d 372 (2008)
 

CSP TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. HEKAL

57 A.D.3d 372 (2008)

869 N.Y.S.2d 449

CSP TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Appellants, v. IHAB M. HEKAL, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

December 18, 2008.

The court lacked authority to entertain the petition to review an intermediary ruling of the arbitrators on a procedural matter (see Mobil Oil Indonesia v Asamera Oil [Indonesia], 43 N.Y.2d 276 [1977]; Avon Prods. v Solow, 150 A.D.2d 236, 239-240 [1989]). Such intervention is not authorized by the CPLR, and is proscribed as a matter of policy. The relief "would disjoint and unduly delay...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases