1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 57 A.D.3d
  5. 57 A.D.3d 217 (2008)
 

IN THE MATTER OF RAPPO v. NEW YORK STATE DIV. OF HUMAN RIGHTS

57 A.D.3d 217 (2008)

868 N.Y.S.2d 59

In the Matter of FRANCES V. RAPPO, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

December 2, 2008.

To the extent petitioner pro se claims that her former employer, New York City Human Resources Administration (HRA), failed to reasonably accommodate her disability, this claim must fail, because at the time she made her request, Executive Law § 292 (21) did not require an employer to provide "reasonable accommodations" (see Riddick v City of New York, 4 A.D.3d 242, 247 [2004]). In any event, substantial evidence supports the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases