The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. Although neither employee spelled out defendant's role in the scheme, two store employees told the police that both defendant and his codefendant were jointly engaged in an effort to make purchases with stolen credit cards. According to an officer, one of the employees specifically pointed out the two men as "the individuals with the cards." This information was corroborated when an officer saw the codefendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.