On December 13, 2005, respondent Division of Parole requested an adjournment of petitioner's final parole revocation hearing. When the court proposed adjourning the hearing to January 9, 2006, petitioner's counsel informed the court he would be away that week, and did not object when the court stated that the next available date was January 30 and that the 21-day period from January 9 to January 30 would be charged to petitioner. Accordingly, petitioner's claim that the 21...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.