1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 55 A.D.3d
  5. 55 A.D.3d 697 (2008)
 

MUNOZ v. CITY OF NEW YORK

55 A.D.3d 697 (2008)

864 N.Y.S.2d 790

THEODORE MUNOZ, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

October 14, 2008.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

The jury's verdict on the issue of liability is supported by legally sufficient evidence, since there was a valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences which could lead a rational person to the conclusion reached by the jury (see Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 N.Y.2d 493, 499 [1978]; Schwalb v Kulaski, 38 A.D.3d 876, 877 [2007])....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases