Appellant's claim that the court improperly denied his request to absent himself, for the purpose of avoiding a suggestive incourt identification, during the identifying witness's hearing testimony is unsupported by the record, which reveals that appellant was actually absent during that witness's testimony.
The placement was a proper exercise of the court's discretion that constituted the least restrictive alternative consistent with the needs of appellant and the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.