Final judgment affirmed without costs.
Petitioners commenced this nonpayment summary proceeding in June 2005, claiming to be the owners of the premises in question. After a nonjury trial, the court below found that petitioners had been divested of title to the property in question as of May 5, 2004. Accordingly, the court dismissed the petition. We affirm.
Contrary to petitioners' argument, it was not error for the court below to consider tenants' defense...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.