On the prior appeal, this Court allowed plaintiffs to amend their bill of particulars to allege violations of Industrial Code (12 NYCRR) § 23-8.1(f)(1)(iv) and (2)(i) and § 23-8.2(c)(3), on the ground that such provisions "could provide a predicate for liability under Labor Law § 241(6)" in that the horizontal movement of the raised load constituted "hoisting" (
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.