PER CURIAM.
While we agree with the motion court that the post-trial documentary evidence submitted by defendant did not constitute newly discovered evidence (see CPLR 5015[a][2]), it was sufficiently indicative of fraud, misconduct or misrepresentation to warrant vacatur of the judgment pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(3) (see Shouse v. Lyons,
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.