DECISION & ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that his statements to law enforcement officials should have been suppressed because the police intentionally prevented his arraignment in order to isolate and interrogate him for a prolonged period of time (see CPL § 140.20[1]; People v. Holland,
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.