Upon this appeal, defendant contends that the judgments convicting him of reckless endangerment in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.20), endangering the welfare of a child (Penal Law § 260.10 [1]) and reckless driving (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1212), were not supported by legally sufficient evidence to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, that the verdicts were against the weight of the evidence and that certain remarks made by the prosecutor during...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.