1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 473 P.3d
  5. 473 P.3d 451 (2020)
 

COTTER ON BEHALF OF READING INT'L v. KANE

No. 75053, No. 76981, No. 77648, No. 77733.

473 P.3d 451 (2020)

136 Nev. Adv. Opn. 63

James J. COTTER, Jr., derivatively ON BEHALF OF READING INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellant, v. Edward KANE; Douglas McEachern; Mary Ann Gould; Judy Codding; Michael Wrotniak; and Reading International, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, Respondents. James J. Cotter, Jr., derivatively on behalf of Reading International, Inc., Appellant, v. Edward Kane; Douglas McEachern; Mary Ann Gould; Judy Codding; Michael Wrotniak; and Reading International, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, Respondents. James J. Cotter, Jr., derivatively on behalf of Reading International, Inc., Appellant, v. Edward Kane; Douglas McEachern; Judy Codding; Michael Wrotniak; and Reading International, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, Respondents. Reading International, Inc., a Nevada Corporation; Margaret Cotter; Ellen Cotter; Guy Adams; Edward Kane; Douglas McEachern; Judy Codding; and Michael Wrotniak, Appellants, v. James J. Cotter, Jr., derivatively on behalf of Reading International, Inc., Respondent.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

FILED October 1, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morris Law Group and Steve L. Morris , Las Vegas, for Appellant/Respondent James J. Cotter, Jr.

Greenberg Traurig, LLP, and Tami D. Cowden , Mark E. Ferrario , and Kara B. Hendricks , Las Vegas, for Respondent/Appellant Reading International, Inc.

Cohen Johnson Parker Edwards and H. Stan Johnson , Las Vegas; Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, and Marshall M. Searcy and Christopher Tayback , Los Angeles, California, for Respondents/Appellants Guy Adams, Judy Codding, Ellen Cotter, Margaret Cotter, Mary Ann Gould, Edward Kane, Douglas McEachern, and Michael Wrotniak.

BEFORE THE COURT EN BANC.

OPINION

James Cotter, Jr. (Cotter Jr.) filed a derivative action on behalf of Reading International, Inc. (RDI), challenging conduct by RDI's board of directors. Both RDI and the directors moved to dismiss the action and later challenged the merits of the action. We conclude that a corporation, as a nominal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases