RESPONSIBLE CANNABIS v. HOBOKEN

DOCKET NO. A-0556-23.

328 A.3d 971 (2024)

480 N.J. Super. 357

HOBOKEN FOR RESPONSIBLE CANNABIS, INC., a New Jersey nonprofit corporation, and Elizabeth Urtecho, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. CITY OF HOBOKEN PLANNING BOARD, Defendant-Respondent, and Blue Violets, LLC, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 30, 2024.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael C. Klauder, Hackensack, argued the cause for appellant (Cole Schotz PC, attorneys; Michael C. Klauder, of counsel and on the briefs).

Daniel L. Steinhagen, Montvale, argued the cause for respondents Hoboken for Responsible Cannabis, Inc. and Elizabeth Urtecho (Beattie Padovano, LLC, attorneys; Daniel L. Steinhagen, of counsel and on the brief).

Richard Brigliadoro, Parsippany, argued the cause for respondent City of Hoboken Planning Board (Weiner Law Group LLP, attorneys; Richard Brigliadoro, of counsel and on the brief; Glenn C. Kienz, Parsippany, on the brief).

Before Judges Gilson, Firko and Bishop-Thompson.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

In this complaint in lieu of prerogative writs matter, defendant Blue Violets LLC (Blue Violets) appeals from the September 26, 2023 Law Division order, which vacated a Resolution of Approval (the Resolution) by defendant City of Hoboken Planning Board (the Planning Board). The Resolution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases