Christa ROBEY and Maureen Reynolds, on behalf of themselves and all others. similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Respondents,
v.
SPARC GROUP LLC, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued November 6, 2023.
Decided March 25, 2024.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Michael D. Meuti (Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff) of the Ohio, California, and District of Columbia bars, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellant (Sills Cummis & Gross, and Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff, attorneys; Jeffrey J. Greenbaum, Charles J. Falletta, Michael S. Carucci, Michael D. Meuti, Stephanie A. Sheridan and Meegan B. Brooks (Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff) of the California bar, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel and on the briefs).
Stephen P. DeNittis, Marlton, argued the cause for respondents (DeNittis Osefchen Prince, attorneys; Stephen P. DeNittis, Joseph A. Osefchen, and Shane T. Prince, on the brief).
Jeffrey S. Jacobson argued the cause for amici curiae the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and the New Jersey Civil Justice Institute (Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath, attorneys; Jeffrey S. Jacobson and Jennifer G. Chawla, on the brief).
Viviana Hanley, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae Attorney General of New Jersey (Matthew Platkin, Attorney General, attorney; Jeremy M. Feigenbaum, Solicitor General, and Angela Cai, Deputy Solicitor General, of counsel, and Viviana Hanley, Zeyad A. Assaf, and Monica E. Finke, Deputy Attorneys General, on the brief).
Jared M. Placitella argued the cause for amicus curiae New Jersey Association for Justice (Cohen, Placitella & Roth, attorneys; Jared M. Placitella, of counsel and on the brief).
Christopher S. Porrino submitted a brief on behalf of amici curiae National Retail Federation and Retail Litigation Center, Inc. (Lowenstein Sandler, attorneys; Christopher S. Porrino and Peter Slocum, on the brief).
JUSTICESOLOMON delivered the opinion of the Court.
In this case, plaintiffs, a class of shoppers at the retail clothing store Aéropostale, allege that the store advertised clothing as being discounted when, in fact, the items had never been offered or sold at the non-discounted prices, or reference...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
