1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 305 A.3d
  5. 305 A.3d 941 (2023)
 

ERNEST BOCK & SONS v. PENNSAUKEN

DOCKET NO. A-3684-22.

305 A.3d 941 (2023)

477 N.J. Super. 254

ERNEST BOCK & SONS-DOBCO PENNSAUKEN JOINT VENTURE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWNSHIP OF PENNSAUKEN and Terminal Construction Corporation, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 30, 2023.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John F. Palladino argued the cause for appellant (Hankin Sandman Palladino Weintrob & Bell, attorneys; John F. Palladino and Colin G. Bell , Atlantic City, on the brief).

Richard Wayne Hunt argued the cause for respondent Township of Pennsauken (Parker McCay, PA, attorneys; Richard Wayne Hunt and Sean T. Fannon , Mount Laurel, on the brief).

Nicholas J. Zaita argued the cause for respondent Terminal Construction Corporation (Peckar & Abramson, PC, attorneys; Nicholas J. Zaita and Brian Christopher Glicos , River Edge, on the brief).

Before Judges Gilson, Berdote Byrne and Bishop — Thompson.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

This appeal presents an issue of first impression — whether a joint venture formed for the sole purpose of bidding on a public contract is required to be registered as a contractor under the Public Works Contractor Registration Act (PWCRA), N.J.S.A. 34:11-56.48 to ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases