SATZ v. SATZ

DOCKET NO. A-3535-21.

301 A.3d 847 (2023)

476 N.J. Super. 536

Ava SATZ, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Allen SATZ, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided August 18, 2023.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allen Satz, appellant, argued the cause pro se.

Angelo Sarno , Roseland, argued the cause for respondent (Synder Sarno D'Aniello Maceri & da Costa, LLC, attorneys; Angelo Sarno, of counsel and on the brief; Michelle Wortmann , Roseland, on the brief).

Before Judges Whipple, Susswein and Gummer.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

In this post-judgment matrimonial matter,1 defendant Allen Satz appeals from various Family Part orders enforcing provisions of the marital settlement agreement (MSA) and awarding counsel fees to plaintiff Ava Satz.2 After...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases