1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 294 A.3d
  5. 294 A.3d 1196 (2023)
 

ARBUS, MAYBRUCH & GOODE v. COHEN

DOCKET NO. A-2168-21.

294 A.3d 1196 (2023)

475 N.J. Super. 509

ARBUS, MAYBRUCH & GOODE, LLC, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Daniel COHEN and Cohen Capital Management, LLC, Defendants-Appellants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 25, 2023.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey Lubin argued the cause for appellants (Law Offices of Lee M. Nigen, attorneys; Jeffrey Lubin , and Matthew B. Weisberg (Weisberg Law), on the briefs).

Sam Maybruch argued the cause for respondent (Arbus, Maybruch & Goode, LLC, attorneys; Sam Maybruch and Matthew R. Goode , Hazlet, on the brief).

Before Judges Sumners, Susswein and Berdote Byrne.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

In this appeal from an award of summary judgment to plaintiff law firm, defendants urge reversal, arguing plaintiff's fee and retainer agreements were illegal and unethical and the court abused its discretion in awarding costs and fees. We discern no error...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases