1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 269 A.3d
  5. 269 A.3d 413 (2022)
 

GRAPHNET, INC. v. RETARUS, INC.

A-71 September Term 2020 085529.

269 A.3d 413 (2022)

250 N.J. 24

GRAPHNET, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RETARUS, INC., Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 11, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Schramm, III, argued the cause for appellant (FisherBroyles, attorneys; Joseph Schramm, III, Princeton, on the briefs).

Karl Geercken argued the cause for respondent (Alston & Bird, attorneys; Karl Geercken and Steven L. Penaro, on the briefs).

In this appeal, the Court considers whether a new trial on all damages is required when the jury is improperly instructed on nominal damages and a plaintiff opposes remittitur.

Plaintiff Graphnet, Inc. and defendant Retarus, Inc. are competitors in the cloud-based messaging industry...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases