1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 243 A.3d
  5. 243 A.3d 662 (2021)
 

STATE v. SINGH

A-37 September Term 2019 083236.

243 A.3d 662 (2021)

245 N.J. 1

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Amrit SINGH, a/k/a Andy Singh, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 21, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Margaret McLane, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney; Margaret McLane, of counsel and on the briefs).

Nancy A. Hulett, Acting Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Yolanda Ciccone, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney; Nancy A. Hulett, of counsel and on the briefs).

Frank Muroski, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae Attorney General of New Jersey (Gurbir S. Grewal, Attorney General, attorney; Frank Muroski, of counsel and on the brief).

In this case, the Court must decide whether a detective's testimony at the trial of defendant Amrit Singh violated N.J.R.E. 701 and requires reversal of defendant's convictions. Specifically, we consider whether it was plain error for the trial court to allow the detective to make two references...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases