1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 218 A.3d
  5. 218 A.3d 1192 (2019)
 

RAJI v. SAUCEDO

DOCKET NO. A-1629-18T1.

218 A.3d 1192 (2019)

461 N.J. Super. 166

Marisol RAJI, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Alfonso SAUCEDO and Yamiris Munoz, Defendants-Appellants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 30, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Robert Gorman , New Brunswick, argued the cause for appellants (Lutz Shafranski Gorman & Mahoney, PA, attorneys; John Robert Gorman , New Brunswick, of counsel and on the briefs).

Andrew Dietmar Ullrich argued the cause for respondent (The Ullrich Law Firm, LLC, attorneys; Andrew Dietmar Ullrich, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges Fisher, Accurso and Gilson.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

In considering the nature of a "pay-and-go" consent judgment, which resolved a summary dispossess action, and the judgment's impact on later-asserted claims for damages, we hold that by entering into such a consent judgment the parties entered into an accord and satisfaction and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases