1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 213 A.3d
  5. 213 A.3d 894 (2019)
 

MATTER OF BARRETT

No. D-126, September Term 2017 No. 081035.

213 A.3d 894 (2019)

238 N.J. 517

In the MATTER OF, Joseph Peter BARRETT, an Attorney at Law.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 15, 2019.

Corrected September 12, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Centinaro, Director, argued the cause on behalf of the Office of Attorney Ethics.

John McGill, III, argued the cause for respondent (McGill Law Practice, attorneys).

In this ethics proceeding, we are called upon to consider whether an attorney who received a 150-day suspension for knowing misappropriation of law firm funds in Utah — a jurisdiction that applies a preponderance of the evidence standard and recognizes no business dispute defense — may, based only on the Utah record, be disbarred...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases