1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 208 A.3d
  5. 208 A.3d 876 (2019)
 

T.L. v. GOLDBERG

A-11 September Term 2018 081135.

208 A.3d 876 (2019)

238 N.J. 218

T.L. and M.L., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Jack GOLDBERG, M.D., and Penn Medicine Cherry Hill, Defendants-Appellants.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 10, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter F. Kawalec, III, argued the cause for appellants (Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, attorneys; Walter F. Kawalec, III, on the briefs).

Michael B. Zerres argued the cause for respondents (Blume Forte Fried Zerres & Molinari, attorneys; Michael B. Zerres, of counsel, and Robin A. Donato, on the brief).

William L. Gold argued the cause for amicus curiae New Jersey Association for Justice (Bendit Weinstock, attorneys; William L. Gold, of counsel and on the brief, and Kay A. Gonzalez, on the brief).

In this case, we must determine whether plaintiff T.L. is entitled to a new trial because — without objection from T.L. — defendant Jack Goldberg, M.D., gave trial testimony inconsistent with his discovery responses.

In this medical malpractice action, T.L. claims Dr...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases