STATE v. VINCENTY

A-40 September Term 2017 079978.

202 A.3d 1273 (2019)

237 N.J. 122

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Adrian A. VINCENTY, a/k/a Adrian A. Vicente and Adrian A. Vicenty, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 11, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen W. Kirsch , Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant ( Joseph E. Krakora , Public Defender, attorney; Stephen W. Kirsch, of counsel and on the briefs).

Frank Muroski , Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent ( Gurbir S. Grewal , Attorney General, attorney; Frank Muroski, of counsel and on the brief, and Erica Bertuzzi , Assistant Hudson County Prosecutor, on the brief).


In State v. A.G.D., this Court held that "[t]he government's failure to inform a suspect that a criminal complaint or arrest warrant has been filed or issued deprives that person of information indispensable to a knowing and intelligent waiver of rights."

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases