1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 203 A.3d
  5. 203 A.3d 133 (2019)
 

DIMITRAKOPOULOS v. BORRUS GOLDIN

A-46 September Term 2017 080357.

203 A.3d 133 (2019)

237 N.J. 91

Evangelos DIMITRAKOPOULOS and Matilde Dimitrakopoulos, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BORRUS, GOLDIN, FOLEY, VIGNUOLO, HYMAN AND STAHL, P.C., Steven L. Fox, Esq. and Anthony B. Vignuolo, Esq., Defendants-Respondents, and Frazer Evangelista & Company, LLC, and Ralph J. Evangelista, Defendants.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 7, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jae H. Cho, Princeton, argued the cause for appellants (Cho Legal Group, attorneys; Kristen M. Logar, on the brief).

James E. Stahl, North Brunswick, argued the cause for respondents (Borrus, Goldin, Foley, Vignuolo, Hyman and Stahl, attorneys; James E. Stahl, North Brunswick, on the brief).

Diana C. Manning, Florham Park, argued the cause for amicus curiae New Jersey State Bar Association (New Jersey State Bar Association, attorneys; Robert B. Hille, President, of counsel and on the brief, and Diana C. Manning, Florham Park, and Peter J. Gallagher, Morristown, on the brief).

The entire controversy doctrine "seeks to impel litigants to consolidate their claims arising from a single controversy whenever possible." Thornton v. Potamkin Chevrolet, 94 N.J. 1, 5, 462 A.2d 133 (1983...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases