1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 181 A.3d
  5. 181 A.3d 981 (2018)
 

KRZYKALSKI v. TINDALL

A-55 September Term 2016 078744.

181 A.3d 981 (2018)

232 N.J. 525

Mark R. KRZYKALSKI and Michele Krzykalski, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. David T. TINDALL, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 17, 2018.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth G. Andres, Jr., argued the cause for appellant Mark R. Krzykalski (Andres & Berger, attorneys; Kenneth G. Andres, Jr., Haddonfield, of counsel and on the brief, and Abraham Tran, on the brief).

Daniel J. Pomeroy argued the cause for respondent (Pomeroy, Heller & Ley, attorneys; Daniel J. Pomeroy, and Karen E. Heller Springfield, on the brief).

Michael J. Epstein argued the cause for amicus curiae New Jersey Association for Justice (The Epstein Law Firm, attorneys; Michael J. Epstein, of counsel and on the brief, and Michael A. Rabasca, Rochelle Park, on the brief).

In this automobile accident case brought under the Comparative Negligence Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:15-5.1 to -5.8 (CNA), we are called upon to determine whether a jury should be asked to apportion fault between a named party defendant and a known but unidentified defendant (John Doe). We conclude that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases