1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 163 A.3d
  5. 163 A.3d 875 (2017)
 

STATE v. DUNBAR

No. 077839. No. A-94 September Term 2015.

163 A.3d 875 (2017)

229 N.J. 521

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mark DUNBAR, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 10, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank Muroski, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Christopher S. Porrino, Attorney General, attorney; Frank Muroski, of counsel and on the briefs).

Stefan Van Jura, Deputy Public Defender II, argued the cause for respondent (Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney; Stefan Van Jura, of counsel and on the briefs).

In this appeal, we consider the appropriate standard for police officers to conduct a canine sniff for the detection of narcotics. In particular, we are called upon to determine whether police require reasonable suspicion of a drug offense to effect a canine sniff during a motor vehicle...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases