1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 139 A.3d
  5. 139 A.3d 84 (2016)
 

SCHWARTZ v. ACCURATUS CORP.

A-73 September Term 2014, 076195

139 A.3d 84 (2016)

225 N.J. 517

Brenda Ann SCHWARTZ and Paul Grant Schwartz, Appellants-Appellants, v. ACCURATUS CORPORATION, In Its Own Right and as Successor in Interest to Accuratus Ceramic Corporation, Respondents-Respondents, and Materion Brush Inc., c/o CT Corporation System, Defendant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 6, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ruben Honik argued the cause for appellants (Golomb & Honik, attorneys).

Joseph G. Harraka, Jr., argued the cause for respondents (Becker Meisel, attorneys; Mr. Harraka, David G. Tomeo, Livingston, and A. Wesley Bridges, Jr., on the brief).

This matter presents a question of law certified and submitted to this Court by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit pursuant to Rule 2:12A-1. The question relates to this Court's earlier opinion in Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 186 N.J. 394<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases