1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 134 A.3d
  5. 134 A.3d 27 (2016)
 

BARDIS v. STINSON

A-44 September Term 2014, 075208

134 A.3d 27 (2016)

224 N.J. 448

Alexander BARDIS and Monica Bardis, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Kitty STINSON and Stinson Claims Services, Defendants, and Cumberland Insurance Group, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 27, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marc L. Dembling argued the cause for appellant (Methfessel & Werbel, attorneys; Mr. Dembling and Jacqueline C. Cuozzo, Edison, on the briefs).

Constantine Bardis, Lake Como, argued the cause for respondents.

The judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division is reversed, and the Law Division's judgment is reinstated, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Sapp-Peterson's dissenting opinion, reported at 444 N.J.Super. 227, 240, 132 A.3d 930 (App.Div.2014) ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases