1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SUMMERFIELD v. ROMANOWSKI
 

SUMMERFIELD v. ROMANOWSKI

No. A-1889-13T2.

CYNTHIA SUMMERFIELD, f/k/a CYNTHIA SUMMERFIELD ARELLANO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CURTIS J. ROMANOWSKI and JOHN NACHLINGER, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 29, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George C. Summerfield (Stadheim & Grear, Ltd.) of the Illinois bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellant ( Peter A. Ouda and Mr. Summerfield, attorneys and on the brief).

Daniel R. Esposito argued the cause for respondents (McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, attorneys; Mr. Esposito, of counsel and on the brief; John W. Kaveney , on the brief).

Before Judges Guadagno, Leone, and Gilson.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

Plaintiff Cynthia Summerfield appeals the trial court's order for summary judgment dismissing her legal malpractice claim against defendant attorneys, Curtis Romanowski and John Nachlinger, who represented her in a matrimonial matter. Plaintiff claims that defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases