STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Michael SUMULIKOSKI, Defendant-Appellant.
State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Artur Sopel, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued September 24, 2014.
Decided March 18, 2015.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Philip A. De Vencentes argued the cause for appellant Michael Sumulikoski (Galantucci & Patuto, attorneys).
Alan L. Zegas, Chatham, argued the cause for appellant Artur Sopel (Law Offices of Alan L. Zegas and Flood & Basile, attorneys; Mr. Zegas, Raymond F. Flood, Hackensack, and Terel L. Klein, on the brief).
David A. Malfitano, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (John L. Molinelli, Bergen County Prosecutor, attorney; Mr. Malfitano and Kenneth M. Ralph, Senior Assistant Prosecutor, on the letter briefs).
Brian J. Uzdavinis, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae Attorney General of New Jersey (John J. Hoffman, Acting Attorney General, attorney).
PER CURIAM.
This case involves the prosecution of a permanent substitute teacher and a school administrator who chaperoned a group of high school students on an overseas class trip. Defendants allegedly sexually assaulted three 17-year-old female students during the trip, and the Bergen County Prosecutor's Office...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
