1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. MAXWELL v. OYOLA
 

MAXWELL v. OYOLA

No. A-6018-12T4.

SHARON MAXWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VICTOR J. OYOLA and CIRDA'S SUPERMARKET, Defendants, and CITY OF VINELAND, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 25, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jordan R. Irwin argued the cause for appellant (Begelman, Orlow & Melletz, attorneys; Mr. Irwin, on the briefs).

Michael E. Benson argued the cause for respondent (Buonadonna & Benson, P.C., attorneys; Mr. Benson, on the brief).

Before Judges Waugh and Accurso.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff Sharon Maxwell appeals from an order for summary judgment dismissing her complaint against defendant City of Vineland on statute of limitations grounds. Because we conclude the matter was not ripe for summary judgment, we reverse.

Maxwell was injured when she tripped on a broken curb in front of Cirda's Supermarket in Vineland. Her counsel served a timely tort...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases