NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Z.E.R., Defendant-Appellant, and
P.T.K., Defendant.
IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF Z.E.R., minor.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Submitted October 27, 2014.
Decided November 14, 2014.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney for appellant (Cecilia M.E. Lindenfelser, Designated Counsel, on the brief).
John J. Hoffman, Acting Attorney General, attorney for respondent (Andrea M. Silkowitz, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Renee Greenberg, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).
Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, Law Guardian, attorney for the minor Z.E.R. (David Valentin, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, on the brief).
Before Judges Sabatino and Guadagno.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
PER CURIAM.
Defendant Z.E.R. (Zak)1 appeals from a November 2013 order terminating his parental rights to his son, Z.E.R. (Evan). Zak claims that the trial court erred in concluding that the Division of Child Protection and Permanency (Division) proved, by clear and convincing evidence, that his parental rights should be terminated. We disagree and affirm.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
