1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 95 A.3d
  5. 95 A.3d 201 (2014)
 

RENNER v. AT & T

A-71 September Term 2011, 068744

95 A.3d 201 (2014)

218 N.J. 435

James P. RENNER, Petitioner-Respondent, v. AT & T, Respondent-Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 30, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ivan R. Novich, Newark, argued the cause for appellant (Littler Mendelson, attorneys).

Patrick R. Caulfield, Edison, argued the cause for respondent (Levinson Axelrod, attorneys).

Judge RODRÍGUEZ (temporarily assigned) delivered opinion of the court.

In this appeal, we consider the statutory requirements for establishing a compensable claim for cardiovascular injury disease or death, as defined by N.J.S.A. 34:15-7.2 (section 7.2) of New Jersey's Workers' Compensation law. Section 7.2 was enacted in 1979 as part of comprehensive reforms to the Workers' Compensation system. In that amendment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases