1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. HURLEY v. TOYOTA MOTOR CORP.
 

HURLEY v. TOYOTA MOTOR CORP.

No. A-5533-12T3.

GABRIEL J. HURLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOYOTA MOTOR CORP., HATCH MOTT MACDONALD, HIGHWAY SAFETY SYSTEMS, INC., CSX CORPORATION, TOYOTA INDUSTRIES CORPORATION (TICO), AND TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, USA, INC., Defendants, and DENSO CORP., NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION, THE TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendants-Respondents, and FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL R. O'MALLEY, THOMAS B. O'MALLEY AND PAUL SCOCCA, Third-Party Defendants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 24, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George L. Psak argued the cause for appellant (Psak & Associates, attorneys; Mr. Psak, on the briefs).

Leona C. McFadden argued the cause for respondent Denso Corporation (Lavin, O'Neil, Ricci, Cedrone & DiSipio, attorneys; Ms. McFadden, of counsel and on the brief; Gerard Cedrone , of counsel and on the brief).

Brian J. Chabarek argued the cause for respondent Township of Edison (Hoagland, Longo, Moran, Dunst & Doukas, LLP, attorneys; Mr. Chabarek, of counsel and on the brief; Matthew S. Schoen , on the brief).

Clark W. Convery argued the cause for respondent County of Middlesex (Convery, Convery & Shihar, P.C., attorneys; Mr. Convery, on the brief).

Peter D. Wint , Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents State of New Jersey/Department of Transportation and New Jersey Transit Corporation ( John J. Hoffman , Acting Attorney General, attorney; Lewis A. Scheindlin , Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Mr. Wint, on the brief).

Before Judges Ashrafi, St. John and Leone.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff Gabriel J. Hurley appeals from the March 15, 2013 order, dismissing his claim as untimely against defendants Township of Edison (Township), County of Middlesex (County), New Jersey Transit Corporation (NJT), State of New Jersey Department of Transportation (DOT), (collectively, the governmental entities), and Denso Corporation, and the May 3, 2013 order denying his motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases