Supreme Court of New Jersey.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued March 17, 2014.
Decided May 22, 2014.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Frank Muroski, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant State of New Jersey (John J. Hoffman, Acting Attorney General, attorney; Mr. Muroski, Mark G. Eliades, and Christopher S. Romanyshyn, Trenton, of counsel and on the briefs).
Vikrant Pawar argued the cause for respondents John Weichsel, Esq., Robert Blossner, Esq., Tom Cataldo, Esq., Murray Richman, Esq., Stacey Richman, Esq., and Paul Chiaramonte, Esq.
Henry E. Klingeman argued the cause for amicus curiae The Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers of New Jersey (Krovatin Klingeman, attorneys; Mr. Klingeman, Florham Park, and Helen A. Nau, Newark, on the brief).
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
PER CURIAM.
This unusual matter comes before the Court on leave granted to the State of New Jersey. In re State Grand Jury Investigation,214 N.J. 112, 67 A.3d 1188 (2013). The appeal arises out of a motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum that had been issued by the State Grand Jury to private criminal defense attorneys for fee records pertaining to "any defendant named within State Grand Jury...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
