1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. EARNEST v. BEDILION
 

EARNEST v. BEDILION

No. A-2616-12T2.

PAMELA EARNEST, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JOSEPH BEDILION, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 9, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard F. Klineburger, III, argued the cause for appellant (Klineburger & Nussey, attorneys; D. Ryan Nussey, on the briefs).

Paul H. Scull, Jr., argued the cause for respondent (The Law Offices of Paul H. Scull, Jr., attorneys; Mr. Scull, on the brief).

Before Judges Lihotz and Maven.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

PER CURIAM.

In this post-judgment matrimonial matter, defendant Joseph Bedilion appeals from a January 18, 2013 Family Part order denying his motion to modify his child support obligation to plaintiff Pamela Earnest. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the order denying relief, but reverse the provision of the order placing conditions on future motion filings.

A.

We glean...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases