L.J. ZUCCA v. ALLEN BROS. WHOLE.

DOCKET NO. A-2723-11T1

82 A.3d 274 (2014)

434 N.J. Super. 60

L.J. ZUCCA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Respondent, v. ALLEN BROS. WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTORS INC., and Plainfield Tobacco & Candy Co., Inc., a/k/a Resnick Distributors, Defendants-Respondents/Cross-Appellants, and Associated Wholesalers Inc., Bee Gee Candy Co., Inc., Consolidated Service Distributors, Inc., Continental Tobacco & Candy Inc., Cooper-Booth Wholesale Company,[] Eby-Brown Company L.L.C., M & J Wholesale, Inc., M. Bernstein & Sons, McLane/MidAtlantic, Inc., Rainbow Heaven Distribution, L.L.C., S & K Imports, Inc., Starkman General Products, Sun Wholesale, Inc., and Vikisha Corp., Defendants-Respondents, and Bucks County Cigar & Candy, Graber Brothers, Inc., Gibby's Wholesale, Glikin Brothers, Inc., Harold Levinson Associates, Inc., Joseph Friedman and Sons of NJ, Inc., Klein Candy Co. L.P., Mandel Tobacco Co. of NJ, Inc., Middlesex Tobacco & Confectionary Co., Inc., Ocean Tobacco, Inc., Planet Wholesale Inc., and Value King Wholesale, Inc., Defendants[].

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 9, 2014.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel R. Chemers , of the District of Columbia, Maryland, and Pennsylvania bars, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent L.J. Zucca, Inc. (Saul Ewing, L.L.P., attorneys; Mr. Chemers, of counsel and on the brief; Francis X. Riley III and Sarah F. Lacey of the Maryland bar, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel and on the brief).

Marvin J. Brauth argued the cause for respondents/cross-appellants (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys for Plainfield Tobacco & Candy Co., Inc. a/k/a Resnick Distributors, Inc.; Pepper Hamilton, L.L.P., attorneys for Allen Brothers Wholesale Distributors, Inc.; Mr. Brauth, of counsel and on the joint brief; Karin K. Sage , Woodbridge, and Michael T. Pidgeon , Princeton, on the joint brief).

Julian Wilsey argued the cause for respondent Consolidated Service Distributors, Inc. ( Franzblau Dratch , Livingston, attorneys; Mr. Wilsey, on the brief).

Amanda J. Lavis and Robert J. Tribeck (Rhoads & Sinon, L.L.P.), of the Pennsylvania bar, admitted pro hac vice, attorneys for respondent Associated Wholesalers Inc. (Ms. Lavis and Mr. Tribeck, on the brief).

Cooper Levenson April Niedelman & Wagenheim, P.A., attorneys for respondents Bee Gee Candy Co., Inc., and Starkman General Products ( Katherine M. Morris , Atlantic City, on the brief).

Paul V. Lucas, Jr. (Greenberg, Trager & Herbst, L.L.P.) and Kalvin Kamien (Greenberg, Trager & Herbst, L.L.P.) of the New York bar, admitted pro hac vice, attorneys for respondents Continental Tobacco & Candy Inc., M. Bernstein & Sons, and Rainbow Heaven Distribution, L.L.C. (Messrs. Lucas and Kamien, on the brief).

Blank Rome, L.L.P., attorneys for respondent Cooper-Booth Wholesale Company; Chance & McCann, L.L.C., attorneys for respondent Eby-Brown Company L.L.C.; Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, L.L.P., attorneys for respondent McLane/MidAtlantic, Inc.; Lawrence Kalikhman (Kalikhman & Rayz, L.L.C.) and Eric Rayz (Kalikhman & Rayz L.L.C.) of the Pennsylvania bar, admitted pro hac vice, attorneys for respondent S & K Imports, Inc.; and Miller, Myerson & Corbo, attorneys for respondent Vikisha Corp. ( Stephen M. Orlofsky , Sheila E. Branyan , of the Pennsylvania bar, admitted pro hac vice, Kevin P. McCann , Shanna McCann , Bridgeton, Francis X. Manning , Cherry Hill, Mr. Rayz , and Gerald D. Miller , Jersey City, on the joint brief).

Choi & Park, L.L.C., Trenton, attorneys for respondent M & J. Wholesale, Inc. ( Chull S. Park , on the brief).

David A. Avedissian , Haddonfield, attorney for respondent Sun Wholesale, Inc.

Before Judges YANNOTTI, ASHRAFI and LEONE.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

ASHRAFI, J.A.D.

Plaintiff L.J. Zucca, Inc., a wholesaler of cigarettes and other products, filed this action in 2005 against twenty-eight other wholesalers alleging violations of New Jersey's Unfair Cigarette Sales Act of 1952 ("the UCSA" or "the Act"), N.J.S.A. 56:7-18 to -38. Plaintiff now appeals from orders of the Law Division entered in November and December 2011 that denied its motion for partial summary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases