1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 68 A.3d
  5. 68 A.3d 1274 (2013)
 

KANE PPTY'S v. CITY OF HOBOKEN

A-96/97 September Term 2011, 069676

68 A.3d 1274 (2013)

214 N.J. 199

KANE PROPERTIES, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Respondent, v. CITY OF HOBOKEN, New Jersey and City of Hoboken City Council, Defendants-Respondents and Cross-Appellants.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 26, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arnold K. Mytelka, Springfield, argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent (Kraemer Burns, attorneys; Mr. Mytelka and John A. Avery, Springfield, on the briefs).

Edward J. Buzak, Montville, argued the cause for respondents and cross-appellants (The Buzak Law Group, attorneys; Mr. Buzak and Susan L. Crawford, on the briefs).

Justice HOENS delivered the opinion of the Court.

The matter before this Court relates to the claim of a property owner who successfully sought a use variance before the local Zoning Board, only to see that grant of relief reversed by the municipality's governing body. Believing that the decision of the governing body was tainted because one of the municipal attorneys who participated in the governing body's proceedings had represented the principal objector to the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases