CROGHAN v. CROGHAN

No. A-2389-11T4 & A-5590-11T4.

KATHLEEN CROGHAN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JOSEPH CROGHAN, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided: June 13, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Croghan , appellant, argued the cause pro se.

Judith L. Rosenthal argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges Axelrad, Sapp-Peterson and Haas.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

PER CURIAM.

In this opinion we address several post-judgment matrimonial orders in two appeals by defendant Joseph Croghan that were calendared back-to-back. The first appeal (A-2389-11T4) involves portions of an October 21, 2011 order that denied defendant's motion to modify his alimony and child support obligations based on changed circumstances, terminated his support obligation for his...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases