1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 27 N.J.
  5. 27 N.J. Tax 293 (2013)
 

MURPHY v. DIRECTOR, DIV. OF TAXATION

No. A-0111-12T3.

27 N.J. Tax 293 (2013)

JOSEPH J. MURPHY AND DIANE FITZMYER-MURPHY, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division.

Decided June 12, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry D. Shapiro (Saul Ewing, LLP) of the Maryland Bar, admitted pro hoc vice, argued the cause for appellants (Saul Ewing, LLP, attorneys; M. Paige Berry and Mr. Shapiro, of counsel and on the briefs).

David B. Bender, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Jeffrey S. Chiesa, Attorney General, attorney; Lewis A. Scheindlin, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Mr. Bender, on the brief).

Before Judges LIHOTZ and KENNEDY.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs Joseph J. Murphy and Diane Fitzmyer-Murphy appeal from a final decision of the New Jersey Tax Court denying their motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of defendant, the Director of the Division of Taxation (Division), which had denied plaintiffs' request for a refund of income taxes previously paid. Murphy v. Dir., Div. of Taxation, 26 N.J.Tax 432, 436 (Tax 2012). On...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases