1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. JOHNSON v. FALASCA
 

JOHNSON v. FALASCA

No. A-1256-11T3.

MEKISHA JOHNSON and WALTER JOHNSON, JR., Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JESSICA FALASCA, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 1, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Confusione argued the cause for appellants (Hegge & Confusione, LLC, attorneys; Mr. Confusione, of counsel and on the brief).

Walter F. Kawalec, III, argued the cause for respondent (Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, attorneys; Mr. Kawalec, on the brief).

Before Judges Simonelli and Koblitz.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

PER CURIAM.

This matter involves a claim by plaintiff Mekisha Johnson that she sustained bodily injuries as the result of an automobile accident that occurred on December 18, 2007. The Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act (AICRA), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1.1 to-35, governed plaintiff's claim, and required her to show that she suffered "a permanent injury within a reasonable degree of medical probability." N...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases